Snapdragon 835 or exynos 8895 What better. Data transfer rate

Flagship processor of the following generation. Although the number 8895 is present in his name, Seouls distributed the chipset into the EXYNOS series 9. The South Korean giant also said that the mass production of the freshly baked solution has already begun. The first smartphones with exynos 8895 will probably become Galaxy S8 +.

New processor Samsung is very similar to his opponent from Qualcomm. Snapdragon 835 was announced last year, although it was also produced by Exynos 8895 using 10-nanometer technology LPE FINFET. Both solutions are characterized by 64-bit architectures of the nuclei, which there are as many as eight.

They can work with 4K screens, transmit 4G data at a speed of up to 1 Gbit / s, and also support faster and wireless charging. EXYNOS and Snapdragon are optimized for 4K content for virtual reality glasses, artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Before you detailed comparison technical characteristics Exynos 8895 and Snapdragon 835, which will help see their differences:

	Exynos 8895.	Snapdragon 835.
Technology	10-nm finfet	10-nm finfet
Number of Cores	Eight-core, 64-bit	Eight-core, 64-bit
Chipset	4 x 2.5 GHz Exynos M2 + 4 x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53	4 x 2.45 GHz Kryo 280 + 4 x 1.9 GHz Kryo 280
Graphics	Arm Mali-G71 MP20	Adreno 540.
Screen resolution	4K UHD (4096 x 2160) or WQUXGA (3840 x 2400) 60 frames / s	4K UHD (4096 x 2160) 60 frames / s
API support	OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 11, Renderscript	OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Renderscript
Oz	LPDDR4X.	2 x 32-bit LPDDR4X 1866 MHz
Memory	eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, & SD 3.0	eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, & SD 3.0
Cameras	28 MP, 28 MP +16 MP	32 mp, 16 megapixel
Camera technology	Dual-Pixel, PDAF	Hybrid AF, Optical Zoom, Face Recognition, HDR
Video	4K at 120 frames / s	4K with 30 frames / s
Reproduction	MFC, 4K at 120 frames / s; H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP9	4K at 60 frames / s; H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP9
Sound	Unknown chipset probably with APTX support	Qualcomm AQSTIC, Qualcomm APTX HD
Digital signal processing	VPU.	Qualcomm Hexagon.
Radiomoodul	LTE Cat. 16 5CA 1 Gb / s Loading; LTE Cat. 13 2CA 150 Mbps	LTE Cat. 16 4CA 1 Gb / s Loading; LTE Cat. 13 2CA 150 Mbps return
Wi-Fi	Two-band Wi-Fi AC / B / G / N with MU-MIMO support	Wi-Fi AD, dual-band Wi-Fi AC / B / G / N with MU-MIMO support
Bluetooth
Global positioning systems	GPS, GLONASS, Beidou	GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, Qzss, Sbas
Safety	SAMSUNG KNOX, SECURITY PROSESSING UNIT	Qualcomm Secure MSM, Qualcomm Haven, Qualcomm Studio Access, Qualcomm SafeSwitch
Charging	Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge, Fast wireless charger (QI & PMA)	QUICK CHARGE 4.0 (USB PD), WIPOWER

As you might notice, Exynos 8895 can record 4K video at 120 frames per second, while Snapdragon 835 is limited to 4K video at 30 frames per second. Anyway, according to preliminary conclusions, the Adreno 540 graphics accelerator from Qualcomm may be more productive than the Mali-G71 MP20 from Samsung. Exynos processor video recorders are limited to the support of DirectX 11, and its opponent Snapdragon can work with the DirectX 12 API. However, they both support Vulkan 1.0, which is more an important aspect, given the platform used.

In area wireless connection There are also differences. Snapdragon 835 integrated module wireless communication Wi-Fi 802.11 AD (60 GHz), which provides data transmission on theoretical speed of 7 Gb / s, but for short distances. Exynos 8895 is limited by two-band Wi-Fi 802.11 AC. In both cases, the user receives support bluetooth standard 5.0.

In general, the speed of these mobile processors will be similar, although in terms of performance of Snapdragon graphics a little ahead of the solution of the South Korean company. Exynos 8895 will be able to boast recording of video with large frequency frames and game experience. Qualcomm offers more options for wireless connection, which is why many large brands, including Samsung, choose the products of this company. American models Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8 Plus will probably be equipped with Qualcomm processors.

It is still difficult to say who is the winner, but this question will have an answer when the first devices on the basis of both chipsets will appear. For many, it is obvious that the fact that Samsung is better Optimizes exynos options for their smartphones than Snapdragon, so it will be hard to determine the present winner.

In early January, Qualcomm introduced his Snapdragon 835 processor, and on February 23, Samsung officially released its EXYNOS 8895 chip to the market. According to expectations, both new processors will stand in many smartphones that will appear in 2017.

However, both processors have common parameterswho turn them into close competitors.

Performance characteristics

If you compare them with predecessors, and Snapdragon, and Exynos were designed to significantly improve the work of the device in which they cost. Qualcomm is strongly spreading rumors that the 835th processor improves work by 20% compared with the 821st version.

On the other hand, it is said that the SAMSUNG single-grip system, called Exynos 8895, is 27% more powerful version of Exynos 8890.

"With the advent of the FINFET-structure, which very effectively controls current leakage, 10-nm technological process Finfet made it possible to increase power by 27% with a decrease in consumption by 40% compared with the 14-nm LPE FINFET-TEMPROCESS, "says the representative of the company.

Number of Cores

Both processors have eight nuclei and go with the newest 10-nm final-technical process, which, by rumors, reduces power consumption to incredible 40 percent.

Graphic processor

Both processors equipped with graphic configurations support toys in 4K format and virtual reality. Snapdragon 835 is Adreno 540, thanks to which, according to rumors, 3D rendering is improving 20% \u200b\u200bcompared to Snapdragon 821.

"Having a SNAPDRAGON processor in its device, you practically erase the boundaries between the real and virtual worlds. With advanced technologies that are created in order to achieve the effect of complete visual immersion, as well as enhanced sound and intuitive interaction you hardly notice the difference between the world of the game from the present world. Graphics are very believable. 3D sound follows you everywhere. But the lag and delay here are reduced here almost to zero, which means that the sea disease will not torment you, and your experience will turn into a solid pleasure, "reports Qualcomm.

In the EXYNOS 8895 graphics processor, there was also significant modifications compared with the Exynos 8890 version. The new System on Exynos crystal can boast a MALI-G71 graphics processor having an impressive 20-nuclear configuration.

Data transfer rate

Both processors support standard LTE. The maximum supported downlink loading speed is 1 Gb / s, while the maximum uplink boot rate admits up to 150 Mbps both on Exynos 8895 and on Snapdragon 835.

No network operator suggested another high speed of data transmission on smartphones, but we think that fans will not know that their device will be able to develop a normal speed if in the future such proposals will appear on the market.

Camera

Exynos 8895 processor supports double chamber With a 28 megapixel main and 16 megapixel auxiliary sensor. For comparison, newest system On a Qualcomm crystal supports a double chamber with a sensor in 16 megapixels.

Recording and playing video

Apparently, in this exynos 8895 took the top over Snapdragon 835. The Qualcomm processor will support the 4K video recording at a speed of 30 frames / s, and play it at 60 frames / sec. But Exynos 8895 will be able to record and play the 4K video at the striking speed of 120 frames / s.

Other parameters

Both processors will have extra optionsthat will allow them to perform various tasks.
An exynos single-grip system supports motion detection, registration (driving) image, video carding and object recognition.

At the same time, Snapdragon 835 will also be equipped with similar object detection algorithms, face recognition and gestures.

What processor is better?

Parameters and functionality suggest how similar these pro-processors are. Despite the fact that in some cases Exynos 8895 overtakes Snapdragon 835, there are other situations in which the Snapdragon one-grip is ahead.

By expectations, both processors will stand in many devices awaiting market entry this year, including those in the following flagship smartphone Samsung, in Galaxy S8. Presumably, Snapdragon 835 We will see in the new offer of the company Samsung version For the United States, while in the international version mobile phone We will be able to see the EXYNOS 8895 chip.

As Gadgets News already told, yesterday our colleagues from Anandtech Shared first test, one version of which (USA, China) is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor, and the other (Russia, Europe) - Samsung Exynos. 9810. The test was impressed by the noticeable superiority of Exynos 9810 over Snapdragon 845 in a single-core GEEKBENCH 4. But how are things in other benchmarks - in particular those measuring the actual graphic speed in games? Let's find out whether to make clarity to this question a new material Anandtech .

To begin with, consider the exynos 9810 clock frequency. Initially, it was attributed to 2.9 GHz, but in smartphone Galaxy S9 It is reduced to 2.7 GHz. Despite this, the single-core performance of Exynos 9810 in Geekbench 4 compared to the predecessor, Exynos 8895, really grew by about twice.

Below are the performance data in integer operations and floating point operations for one MHz clock frequency:

But as it should be expected, with the simultaneous work of several nuclei of them clock frequencyIn order to avoid overheating of the processor, it decreases: two nuclei - up to 2314 MHz, three and four to 1794 MHz. Accordingly, the growth of the chip multi-core speed is no longer so impressive. Gadgets News offers you a table in which the results of tests conducted by the resources are collected. Gsmarena. and Anandtech.

Let's start with the testing of the CPU (in brackets are the percentage of the maximum value that is highlighted in bold):

Model	Galaxy S9.		Galaxy S8.		iPhone 8.
CPU	Exynos 9810.		Snapdragon 835.	Exynos 8895.	A11
CPU	4 x exynos m3 4 x Cortex A55	4 x Kryo 385 4 x Kryo 385	4 x Kryo 280 4 x Kryo 280	4 x exynos m3 4 x Cortex A55	2 x Monsoon. 4 x Mistral
Geekbench 4 integer (single-core)	3,734 (81%)	2,718 (59%)	2,076	2,096	4,630
GEEKBENCH 4 floating point (single-core)	3,440 (87%)	2,041 (52%)	1,410	1,566	3,958
GEEKBENCH 4 (single-core)	3,698		1,832	1,991
GEEKBENCH 4 (multi-core)	8,976		6,301	6,656
Antutu 7.	254,375			199,022
PCMark Work 2.0 - Web Browsing	5,253 (66%)	7,946	6,271	5,290
PCMark Work 2.0 - Writing	4,594 (56%)	8,137	7,131	4,797
PCMark Work 2.0 - Data Manipulation	5,057 (81%)	6,211	5,404	4,043
PcMark Work 2.0 - Photo Editing	5,956 (34%)	17,745	11,251	7,218
WebXPRT 2015 - OS WebView	178 (51%)	291 (83%)	194	166	349
Speedometer 2.0 - OS WebView	26.70 (30%)	43.10 (48%)	29.20	22.08	88.90

It should be noted that the results of the Galaxy S8 with Snapdragon 835 in some tests are noticeably lower than that of other smartphones with the same processor (first of all). Therefore, it is likely that the performance of the SNAPDRAGON 845 The performance of Galaxy S9 will be lower than that.

As you can see from the table, the performance of Galaxy S9 with the Exynos 9810 processor in all other, in addition GEEKBENCH 4.Tests were a depressing low level. For example, in PCMark Work 2.0 It ranges between 81% and 34% of SNAPDRAGON 845 speed in reference smartphone Qualcomm. In tests WebXPRT 2015. and Speedometer 2.0. The situation is little better - 61-62%. Moreover, some of the tests have even noticeably surpassed their successor.

Anandtech Already contacted about this with Samsung, and there they answered that on the Demonstration Sample Galaxy S9 for the MWC 2018 exhibition was installed special softwarewhich " may not be optimized". The company reported that they plan to configure the version with Exynos 9810 to the level corresponding to

The following tests were assessed by graphic performance, which, perhaps, relevant to the speed of the CPU, since a bottleneck in the performance of smartphones is primarily the games. So, the following results were obtained (Off-Screen):

Model	Galaxy S9.	Qualcomm Reference Smartphone	Galaxy S8.		iPhone 8.
CPU	Exynos 9810.		Snapdragon 835.	Exynos 8895.	A11
GPU	Mali G72. MP18. (572 MHz)	Adreno 630.	Adreno 540. (670/710 MHz)	Mali G71 MP20 (546 MHz)
GFXBENCH MANHATTAN 3.1.	45.70 (75%)	60.90	38.90	42.49	60.34
GFXBENCH T-REX	143.4 (84%)	150.8 (88%)	110.1	121.8	171.4
GFXBENCH CAR Chase	25		12	13
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal	1,451		817	1,189

As you can see, the test results of the GPU turned out to be no less contradictory - in a fairly outdated T-REX, the Exynos 9810 processor was almost at the same level with Snapdragon 845, and at Manhattan 3.1 ranged from it 75%. In turn, in the most new and heavy test GFXBENCH, Car Chase, Exynos 9810 twice the Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 8895 - despite the fact that in the Samsung press release he was attributed to the increase in 20%.

As it happens usually, Samsung introduced several modifications of flagship apparatus. And S8 Plus is supplied in two modifications: the first - for residents of the United States and China, it works on the Snapdragon 835 processor, the second version for the rest of the world is equipped with an Exynos 8895 processor.

We offer to compare two options and determine which version will turn out to be more powerful. Samsung Galaxy S8, equipped with an Exynos 8895 processor, scored 174 155 points in Antutu 174, bypassing even the iPhone 7 Plus. The version on the SNAPDRAGON 835 processor scored only 162 101 score, which, of course, is quite good, but the difference of 12 thousand points, in our opinion, is essential.

Exynos 8895.

Snapdragon 835.

Although there are nuances here, because in terms of customization of the device (the ability to flash the device) version on Snapdragon looks more impressive.

However, let's say honestly, the result was not impressed by us. After all, the iPhone 7 Plus was introduced in September - 7 months have passed since then. And only after 7 months samsung It was possible slightly ahead of the iPhone 7 in terms of performance. Such a skill of events is not happy for one simple reason - in September Apple will release new iPhone. And then the Koreans will have to be not easy.

Although, of course, iron is currently not as important as, for example, the quality of the display or camera. What do our readers think about it? What version of s8 would you buy?

According to Phonearena

We are all already knowing about the release of the new Snapdragon 835 processor, what to expect from this premium chipset. Snapdragon 835 was recently tested in the most popular tests, as well as compared with previous flagship chips.

Comparison Snapdragon 835 with Snapdragon 821 and Exynos 8890

Of course, results comparison Snapdragon. 835 with Snapdragon 821 and the Samsung Exynos 8890 processor represent the greatest interest for us, as they are the most ubiquitous flagship chips Android smartphones. Test results were obtained from Google Pixel XL (Snapdragon 821) and Samsung Galaxy S7 (Exynos 8890).

We can make fairly accurate assumptions regarding the increase in GPU performance at 835 chip, over the more well-known high-performance processors last year. You can even compare some of the results of preliminary control indicators of Samsung Exynos 8895, feeding new Galaxy S8 and S8 +.

Keep in mind, all the following results do not yet provide a realistic assessment.

GEEKBENCH 4 (test processor)

In the multi-core test of the GEEKBENCH 4 processor, the new 835 received (6.461 points), it is a colossal ~ 58% more multi-core performance Snapdragon 821 (4.089 points), and an increase compared to exynos 8890 (5.358 points) was ~ 20.58%.

In a single-core test, performance improvement was also noted, but less impressive. Snapdragon 835 scored (2.059 points), which is ~ 25.7% more than Snapdragon 821 (1.638 points) and by ~ 10.3% than Exynos 8890 (1.866 points).

Some time ago, new chip Exynos 8895 scored 1.978 points (in a single-core test) and 6.375 (multi-core) in the preliminary result of the GEEKBENCH. In this case, the powerful 835th is ~ 4% faster in one-core and by ~ 1.35% in a multi-core test. Of course, in Galaxy S8, after proper basic optimization procedures, the numbers may be a little better, but this is what we see now.

GFXBENCH (Test GPU)

Test GFXBENCH, especially - the GPU test, very demanding, even for the most modern devices. The SNAPDRAGON 835 result is (1.513 points), by ~ 31.79% faster than that of Snapdragon 821 (1.148 points) and by ~ 67.36% than EXYNOS 8890 (904 points). This is a slightly typical jump in the performance of the GPU between Snapdragon and Samsung Socs, which lack the GPU power compared to Qualcomm.

The reason for this - samsung uses graphic processors Arm Mali. Graphic power is necessary if Samsung wants to achieve parity or ahead of the processor with the patented Adreno GPU from Qualcomm.

As for older and less complex GFXBench tests, such as Manhattan and T-Rex, Snapdragon 835 still shows its power, wiping the floor by both last year's processors. For the sake of brevity, we will not make individual calculations to increase productivity for each test, but we give a chart that speaks for itself. Snapdragon 835 with ADRENO 540 just a beast!

ANTUTU (System Check)

AnTUTU is a complex test system, with six-digit high indicators. The new processor 835 reached 181,939 points, which corresponds to the previous results 181.434, dated December 7, 2016. Thus, the advantages of Qualcomm 835 per ~ 32.5% more than in 821 (137.290) and by ~ 34% than EXYNOS 8890 (135.691) .

With consistently positive results, you probably thought that Qualcomm should open a bottle of champagne and forget about all losers. Not! A few days ago, Galxy S8 with Exynos 8895 lit up in Antutu with a high score of 205.284 points. Samsung has an advantage in performance by 12% greater, compared with the gladiator from Qualcomm.

Since these are Antutu points, we tend to believe that Samsung uses (in production) the most fast memory RAM for storage, not the most best processor With graphic processing. But while we can only assume.

Suitable

Given all the circumstances, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 processor is a very serious jump in performance, it will be a very fast mobile processor of 2017. Typical use of smartphone, smart algorithms artificial Intelligence And processing 4K video -Cing trifles for a new chipset.