Comparison Snapdragon 625 and 652. MediaTek Helio X20 or Snapdragon? Comparison of chipsets. Everything like in a cool processor, but in small doses

Qualcomm at the beginning of 2016 updated the line of the middle class chipsets, submitting several interesting models. A secondary solution (located between Snapdragon 430 and 650/652) became Snapdragon 625, a solid middle class representative. In the second half of 2016, this chip has already been released interesting smartphones both from recognized Grand and companies from China. The beginning of 2017 chip is a reference middle class representative and maintains relevance.

Technically, SNAPDRAGON 625 chip is a balanced solution created using the most actual technological standards. It was created on the technical process of 14 nanometers, thus being the first chipset in the series created on these standards of lithography.

CPU

Snapdragon 625 chipset contains 8 processor cores on the Cortex A53 microarchitecture. They are an intermediate solution capable of showing acceptable performance, without loading the battery and not heating over the measure. All kernels are grouped into a single cluster. Their frequency is regulated dynamically, depending on the load, and can reach 2 GHz.

Graphics processor and screen

The graphics processing in Snapdragon 625 is engaged in integrated graphic processor ADRENO 506, belonging to the new one (at the time of writing the material) generation of built-in Qualcomm graphics. It contains 96 computing blocks operating at a frequency of 650 MHz. Peak performance adreno 506 is about 130 Gflplops. Graphics in Snapdragon 625 supports API Vulcan 1.0, OpenGL 3.1, as well as DirectX 11.2.

The display controller in Snapdragon 625 supports work with permit fulllHD. Maximum resolution It can be 1920x1200 points. In this mode, the update frequency of the picture is 60 Hz (FPS).

Memory controller

The memory controller in the chipset is designed to work with the LPDDR3 memory at a frequency of 933 MHz. There is only one communication channel with RAM (which is typically in the middle class), its bandwidth Reaching 7.5 GB / s. EMMC 5.1 and SD 3.0 controllers are provided for working with permanent memory.

Communication

The modem integrated into the chipset supports LTE CAT 13 in transmission mode (up to 150 Mbps) and CAT 7 to receive (300 Mbps). Theoretically, it is possible to work 2 sim cards in LTE networks, in practice it all depends on the smartphone. From earlier standards 3G WCDMA (HSPA), CDMA, TD-SCDMA and GSM are supported. At the iron level, all popular frequency ranges are supported, but their list can be limited to the modem drivers.

Wi-Fi supports working with 802.11a, B, G, N, AC standards, at frequencies of 2.4 and 5 GHz. Theoretically peak speed can reach 433 MB / s, but in practice it will be lower, as only one MIMO channel is provided.

Navigation capabilities allow you to use GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, and even Galileo to orienting satellites (which is at the input stage). Also provided bluetooth support 4.1, NFC, IR port. Snapdragon 625 is the first mid-level chipset that supports USB 3 generations.

Cameras

Snapdragon 625 chipset contains a double ISP (image processing processor), which allows double chambers. For a single matrix, resolution is limited to 24 MP. When using two sensors - their resolution must be no more than 12 mp. There is a hardware support for recording video in 4K with a frequency of 30 frames per second.

Other features

Snapdragon 625 is equipped with a DSP (digital signal processing processor) Hexagon 546. It is responsible for processing data from various devices, such as screen sensor, and is designed to reduce the load on processor kernels, reduce battery consumption. Also, the chipset supports active noise reduction technologies. The charge controller built into the chip is compatible with quick charging Quickcharge 3.0.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 Performance

Modern characteristics are good, but without practical results of the meaning of them a bit. In terms of performance, Snapdragon 625 is not bad. The processor consists of Cortex A53 nuclei, which, although they do not shine with power, but not prone to overheating. In single-core mode, the chip does not work much faster than budget analogues, but in multi-core, due to frequency, there is a decent potential. The kernels are not grouped into the Big.Little scheme, and it gives the future to the future.

In the test GEEKBENCH 4 single-core mode gives about 800 points, multi-core - without a small 3000. In ANTUTU, the chipset is gaining 60-65 thousand points. The graph accounts for about 12-15 thousand, which is a good indicator. In practice, such results mean that the processor is quite suitable for demanding games. Many of them will go to maximum settings, Only in the most demanding may need to establish the average quality.

For web surfing and multimedia functions, speed is also sufficient. H264 and H265 decoding hardware support provides the ability to play high-definition video, up to 4K permission.

Summing up I would like to note that this is one of the best decisions in terms of price / quality in the mobile chipsets market. This chip is at the moment an uncompromising option, and smartphones with it, mostly good level.

Qualcomm can be safely called the micro-processor market leader for smartphones. Its products are used in their devices most of the leading brands, and in terms of performance, even the average Snapdragon often exceeds the top chipsets from MediaTek.

The lineup snapdragon processors Classified by the company for 3 groups: 400 series - Solutions initial level For budget smartphones, 600 series - mid-level processors, 800 series - top chips for flagship devices.

In this article, we will deal with what is better than Snapdragon 625 VS 650, whether there is a difference between the processors in the daily use of the smartphone, and which chipset is better to choose mobile gemina lovers.

Snapdragon 650 VS Snapdragon 625

650 Dragon is present on the market for a long time, it was presented in February 2015 at number 618, but later it was renamed and took up the top position in the middle class. Snapdragon 625 - chipset, announced in mid-2016, the decision is new, but already well-rolled and deserved many positive feedback.

What is better? Let's start comparing with basic technical characteristics. SNAPDRAGON 650 - Made 28 nm of the technical process and built on the basis of 6 nuclei, of which 2 high-performance Cortex A72 (1.8 GHz) and 4 Energy-efficient Cortex A53 (1.4 GHz). The chipset is equipped with a graphics accelerator ADRENO 510, capable of issuing a capacity of about 180 gigaflops. Embedded LTE Modem (X8) data exchange rate can reach up to 300 MB / s, there is support for NFC interfaces, Bluetooth 4.1 and USB 2.0, also provides fast charging.

Snapdragon 625 is an 8-core chip, made on a more modern 14 mm technical process, which provides better energy efficiency and smaller heating. It consists of 8 Cortex A53 cores, overclocked to a clock frequency of 2.0 GHz. The chip is equipped with a weaker adreno 506 graphics accelerator (performance up to 130 gigaflops), but at the same time wins in terms of support wireless interfacessince it has a fresh modem LTE X9 and USB 3.0, there are nFC support With quick charging.

The most objective way to compare 2 different processors is their comparison based on the results of synthetic tests. We have the following indicators:

As you can see, 625 Dragon exceeds 650 only in general performance in Geekbench (test does not take into account the graphic part), where 8 cores Cortex A-53 make themselves felt. However, in all tests associated with 3D graphics, due to the more powerful Snapdragon 650 video accelerator takes the top. And this is what is more important in practice.

The output is simple - if you like to play resource-intensive 3D toys, it makes sense to choose a smartphone with a 650 dragon, it will provide better game performance. The difference between chipsets is not so big. You can start and playing in the most difficult games without problems and on Snapdragon 625, the differences are only able to exhibit the best graphics settings, have smaller drawdownsFPS in complex scenes, and also not so often meet a variety of micro-friezes and picked up, which is in aggregate and Determines the comfort of gaming.

With the daily operation of the smartphone, the performance of both processors will be enough with your head, and without playing the difference between them, you will not notice. Both chipsets have proven themselves well, including due to the minimum exposure to heating and trottling.

Summing up in battle Qualcomm Snapdragon. 625 VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 650, we give the 650-Dragon champion belt as the most productive processor, which can be found in comparatively today inexpensive smartphonesBut we recognize that the needs of the average user can equally satisfy both chipset.

Top smartphones on Snapdragon 650

A commitment to Snapdragon 650 is known to Xioami, which has released many successful smartphones on this chip, which has been popular thanks to the excellent price / obligation ratio.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro

RN3P is one of the best-selling smartphones in the world of 2016, which will not lose its purchasing appeal in the foreseeable future. For 11 thousand rubles you will get a chic device with a powerful processor and 32/3 GB of memory, large and high-quality 5.5 '' IPS Full HD screen, cameras on 16/5 MP and a battery with a battery, which is enough for 2-3 days of full use of the smartphone .

The shortcomings are not so much - the mediocre quality of the pictures, no NFC And not the fastest fingerprint scanner. However, for its price, this is an excellent smartphone that we definitely recommend to buy.

Xiaomi Mi Max

MI MAX - a huge filboard with a 6.44 inch screen, capable of boasting excellent autonomy (battery per 4850 mAh), performance (SNAPDRAGON 650 + 32 / 3GB + Micro SD) and affordable price. If the prospect is to use a slightly cut in the size of the tablet as a phone, you do not scare you, then you can take - alternatives from Max, not so much.

Disadvantages - frankly bad cameras (However, it is possible to use Camera2API for shooting in RAW, which is slightly correcting the syomation) and not the most attractive design. Price - from 12 thousand rubles.

Top smartphones on Snapdragon 625

Snapdragon 625 released great amount Smartphones, which once again confirms the view that the chipset turned out to be extremely successful. The best in our opinion are.

Nubia Z11 mini s

Z11 mini s - one of the best camerafones in the middle price segment and just a beautiful gadget with balanced characteristics. The smartphone has on board a 5.2 '' Full HD IPS screen, 64/4 GB of memory with the possibility of expansion, the main chamber is 23 meters and the front of 13 megapixel (there is a 4K video record), ankb per 3000 mAh.

Disadvantages - raw shell Nubia UI and mediocre spoken speaker. Price - from 17 thousand rubles.

Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime

REDMI 4 PRIME - middling with a productive processor and high-quality FHD screen. Smartphone made in metal building With fingerprint scanner, has 32/3 GB of memory + slot under a Micro-SD, and a thick battery for 4010 mAh.

If you order from China, then the smartphone can be taken for $ 130, we start prices for the device from 10 thousand rubles, which puts it in one row with Redmi Note 3 Pro. If the sizes of RN3P are frightened, then Redmi 4 will be excellent option for purchase. By the combination of the characteristics of competitors, he has little.

Huawei Nova.

Huawei Nova is a balanced medium-level device with NFC working in Russia. Among the advantages - high-quality 5 '' FHD display, good cameras on 12/8 megapixel, interesting design and elegant build quality. Disadvantages - price (from 20 thousand), mediocre autonomy (battery for 3020 mAh) and the absence of fast charging.

If the article was useful to you, do not forget to add to the bookmarks (CNTR + D) so as not to lose and subscribe to our channel!

According to the reports of analysts and manufacturers of smartphones, not flagships or state employees, but balanced models of the middle level, are in the greatest demand. Therefore, in this price category A serious struggle is flared up, which includes chipset manufacturers. In early 2016, Qualcomm introduced the first chip of the 600 series, based on the technical process of 14 Nm - Snapdragon 625. At about the same time, MediaTek showed the world first ten-tenary processor for mobile technology - Helio X20 (MT6797). In the model range of the Taiwanese developer, it is a foremost (cooler - only overclocked modification of Helio X25), but at a price and capabilities refers to the average level.

Based on both chipsets, a lot of smartphones came out. Qualcomm brainchild interested both the leader in the face of Samsung and the Chinese company Lenovo, Xiaomi. MEDIATEK chipset also turned out to be popular, but the leaders reacted to it more cool. But Xiaomi, Meizu, Leeco and Chinese firms are smaller - created a good selection of suitable gadgets with it inside. To find out what kind of chipset is better, consider their pros and cons of the more detailed.

Pros and Cons Helio X20

Pros:

• Flexible multiclastic CPU configuration. The Helio X20 chipset contains 10 nuclei grouped into 3 clusters. The first consists of a pair of high-frequency (2.1 GHz) Cortex A72 intended for heavy tasks that can load only 1 or 2 kernels. The second - includes 4 Cortex A53 with a high frequency (1.85 GHz), for multi-threaded tasks, and is characterized by reduced consumption. The third cluster is identical to the second, but works at reduced frequencies (1.4 GHz) to save the charge even more. Dynamic switching between nuclei, depending on the current task, allows you to select the optimal balance between performance and power consumption.
• Two-channel memory controller. The chipset is equipped with a two-channel memory controller, which theoretically makes Helio X20 faster when starting and switching between programs, as well as when processing background tasks.
• Powerful screen controller. MediaTek chipset is equipped with a display controller supporting QHD resolution (up to 2560x1600 points), as well as work in FullHD with a 120 Hz image update frequency. Such characteristics closer to the flagships and make smartphones based on Helio X20 more adapted to view the content of high definition and working with virtual reality.
• Price. MediaTek won the market share due to low prices, and so far its chips are relatively cheap. Thereby chinese manufacturers Could initially offer smartphones with him at an attractive value.

Minuses:

• Problems with autonomy.In the theory and in the infographics of marketers MediaTek, a multi-cluster configuration looks attractive, but in practice it is not so smooth. The system does not always correctly evaluate the load and activates the most optimal CPU configuration, which is fraught with rapid charge and heating consumption. For example, in applications that are enough 4 nuclei of A53, the A72 kernels may be unreasonably involved, which in this situation are unnecessarily voracious.
• Heat out. Helio X20 is made according to the process of 20 nm, which is not the worst option today, but is inferior to 14 and 16 nm in terms of energy efficiency. Yes, the integrated MEDIATEK modem consumes more than Qualcomm. Because of this (as well as for the reason for the quality optimization of the Chinese developers, the smartphones on the Helio X20 chipset during long-term load are prone to overheat and reduce performance.
• Problems with OS update. MediaTek is famous for special, selective attitudes to the support of manufacturers. Frequently important situations when for budget chipsets a new version Android and drivers come out in just a couple of months after the release of OS Google (as it was with MT6737), and for the top - "promised three years wait." Earlier, Android 6 for Helio X10 received only a pair of HTC models, and Android 7 for Helio X20 the owners are waiting for half a year. There is no visible promotion in this regard yet that it does not please.

Pros and Cons Snapdragon 625

Pros:

• Thin techprocess. Snapdragon 625 chipset is manufactured according to the most subtle and modern (from the mass-produced, state for March 2017) of the technical process of 14 nm. Due to this, it is characterized by low energy consumption and weak heat generation.
• High frequency. All Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 kernels have ARM Cortex A53 microarchitecture, are not divided into groups, and operate at a frequency of up to 2 GHz. Frequency varies dynamically, depending on the load. This provides a high speed of processing tasks optimized for multi-threaded calculations.
• Support USB 3.0. Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 supports USB 3.0, which gives high connection speed when working with OTG flash drives, external SSD and other accessories.
• Powerful modem. Snapdragon 625 integrated communication module that supports all topical communication standards, up to LTE CAT 7. It is capable of working with any frequency range and ensure the simultaneous activity of two SIM cards in LTE networks.

Minuses:

• Cortex A53 architecture. The Cortex A53 microarchitecture is a balance between high performance and low energy consumption. The specific performance on it is significantly lower than that of A72, therefore in tasks that require 1-2 rapid nuclei, Snapdragon 625 will notice the MT6797.
• More modest screen controller. The display controller in the SNAPDRAGON 625 chipset is able to work only in FullHD (up to 1920x1200 points) and only with the update frequency up to 60 Hz. If you use a smartphone for VR - this may be not enough, as the result, the eyes will be fastened faster.
• GP Adreno 506 may give Mali T880 MP4. Theoretical performance of Qualcomm Adreno 506 graphics is higher than that of Mali T880 MP4 in MT6797. However, due to the best optimization of software on Mali, the physician chip may be ahead of the opponent if its temperatures are normal.

RESULTS

To visually sum up and decide what is better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 or MediaTek Helio. X20, we reduce the key parameters and features of the chipsets in the table. SOC, on the side of which at the selected item is observed the advantage, it receives a plus behind - minus.

Based on comparison, you can make several conclusions. So, in terms of productivity - the potential of Helio X20 is more than Snapdragon 625. In theory, it is faster, has powerful processorSupports QHD screens. However, in practice, all these advantages are leveled by the tendency to overheating, and the actual speed of both chipsets is approximately at the same level. Even a two-channel memory controller does not save.

Given the unpleasant moment with overheating, as well as the obvious advantages of the Qualcomm chipset on a part of the modem and communications - it can be concluded that Snapdragon 625 is more balanced. The situation with OS updates is also not on the side of MTK. Her visual illustration - smartphones Xiaomi.. The first Redmi Note 4 (on MTK) has not yet received updates to Android 7, and exactly (at the official level) is unknown whether they will be at all. But for (on the Kluckom) - the beta version of the seven for testers appeared in January, shortly after the presentation of this smartphone in India. So if updates are important to you - here Snapdragon 625 is clearly better.

Perhaps you will be interested:

Snapdragon 430 and SNAPDRAGON 625 processors put in budget smartphones. We look, which one is better in characteristics, battery consumption and speed?

Snapdragon 430 and Snapdragon 625 processors are some of the best chipsets for smartphones of the budget market segment. Their performance cannot be compared with today's flagships, but it is quite comparable to the top processors of 2014-2015. In addition, in contrast to old chips, Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 and SD 430 processors support a number of new features implemented in the best chips of 2016.

Snapdragon 430 processor: Benefits and Features

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 processor was presented in September 2015. Architecture - 8 Arm Cortex-A53 cores. A similar architecture is applied in more advanced Snapdragon 652 chips and Snapdragon 810. Moreover, even the top has 4 cores Cortex-A53! True, in new processors, the kernels are used as "slow" and are intended for solving simple tasks in energy-saving mode.

Snapdragon 430 processor graphics adapter - Adreno 505. The graphics of the five hundred series stands in best processors Qualcomm - Snapdragon, and even. True, those stand Adreno 530 and Adreno 540, but the fact remains a fact.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 supports cameras with a resolution of up to 21 MP and recording video in 1080p @ 30fps format. Bluetooth 4.1 is supported, displays with full HD resolution and NFC technology ( bank cards in phone). QHD permission is not supported, however, in state employees, such displays are not set.

Be sure to select the support for quick charging Quick Charge 3.0 (the smartphone is charging up to 50% in about 30 minutes). Modem LTE Cat.4 is not the best option. The speed of download is limited to 150 Mbps, recoil - 50 Mbps. RAM LPDDR3 800 MHz is a disadvantage against the background of the flagships, but the rate for state employees.

Verdict. Thanks to the Adreno 505 chart, good nuclei and support architecture modern technologies Snapdragon 430 occupies a niche of a good state employee with advanced features.

Snapdragon 625 processor: the best state budget 2016

The main difference between 625 from 430 and other budget chips is the production technology. Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 is produced according to the 14-nm technical process, while all other budget category chips - on the process of 20 nm or 28 nm. That is, productivity growth and reduction of SD 625 power consumption is provided by default.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 processor appeared in the second quarter of 2016. The chipset is assembled on the basis of the same Cortex-A53 cores, but their frequency is increased to 2.0 GHz, against 1.4 GHz in 430 models. Progress is achieved through the use of modern 14 Nm technical process.

When performing simple tasks, the performance of the 625th is practically no different from the speed of powerful chips, the energy-saving part of which is assembled on the basis of the same Cortex-A53 cores.

In addition, the Snapdragon 625 processor has a more perfect accelerator - Adreno 506. We note more modern modem - LTE Cat.7 / Cat.13 (download / distribution - 300/150 Mbps). Another 625th supports cameras up to 24 megapixel and recording 4K video at a speed of 30 frames per second. As a result, this chip bypass the 430 model and in games, both in web-surfing, and in photo and video photography.

Verdict. Experts compare the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 processor not with the middle peasants of 2015, but with old hits - Snapdragon 800 and Helio P20. And in this comparison, SD 625 looks very convincing. In early 2016, chipsets even put on the phones from the average price segmentAnd today it can be found in the best state employees.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 and Snapdragon 625 processor characteristics

Characteristics Snapdragon 430 and Snapdragon 625

	Qualcomm Snapdragon 430.	Qualcomm Snapdragon 625.
TechProcess	28 nm	14 nm
Number of Cores	8	8
Processor architecture	8x Arm Cortex A53	8x Arm Cortex A53
Clock frequency	up to 1.4 GHz	up to 2.0 GHz
Graphics	Adreno 505.	Adreno 506.
RAM	LPDDR3 800 MHz	LPDDR3 993 MHz
Screen resolution	until 1920 x 1080p	until 1920 x 1080p
Camera	up to 21 mp.	up to 24 meters
Record video	Full HD @ 30fps	4K Ultra HD @ 30fps
LTE modem	Cat.4, 150/50 Mbps	CAT.13 / Cat.7, 300/150 Mbps
Fast charge	QUICK CHARGE 3.0.	QUICK CHARGE 3.0.

Smartphones on the Snapdragon 430 processor

• - Regenerated legend with 4 GB RAM, 5.5-inch Full HD screen and 43889 points in Antutu.
• ASUS Zenfone 3 Laser is a promising apparatus from the "Foreign Minister +" segment with a 5.5-inch screen, 4 GB of RAM and 37851 points in Antutu.
• - One of the best state employees of 2016, equipped with a 5-inch HD display, 2 GB of RAM and a battery of 4100 mAh. In ANTUTU, this model scored 42989 points.
• - New 2017 ,. The device received Android 7.0, cameras at 13/5 Mp and 2/3 GB of RAM.

Smartphones on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 processor

In 2016, manufacturers have used the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 processor in smartphones from the "Upper Half" of the budget segment of the market:

• Huawei Nova Plus - strong middle class With 5.5-inch Full HD display, 3 GB of RAM, a 16 megapixel camera, a battery of 3340 mAh and 60,000 points in Antutu.
• ASUS Zenfone 3 Ze520KL is a very promising version of the smartphone with 4 GB of RAM, a 5.2-inch screen with high density Pixels (424 ppi) and brightness at 600 CD / M2 (read even in the sun). In ANTUTU, this middling scored 59564 points.
• Moto Z Play is another legend restored in September 2016. Antutu dials 59,600 points, equipped with a 5.5-inch Full HD screen, 3 GB of RAM and a very good 16 megapixel camera based on the Omnivision OV16860 sensor.
• - the long-awaited continuation of the model range of the legendary brand announced at the end of February 2017. This smartphone will receive a camera for 12/5 MP, 3 GB of RAM and Android 7.0 directly from the box.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 and Snapdragon 625

Comparison of 430 and 625 performance models are far from the benefit of the 28-nm processor. In the GeekBench Snapdragon 625, created on the basis of 14-nm technology and 8 overclocked up to 2.0 GHz cores Cortex A53, confidently leads a competitor. Note. Charts are incorrectly displayed in the Samsung Internet browser and some built-in browsers. mobile platforms. We recommend opening a publication in Google Chrome., Opera or Firefox.

It remains to choose in the "Table Settings" those characteristics that are most important for you. To do this, it is enough to put a tick opposite the corresponding characteristic.

Accordingly, if you want to compare smartphones on the Snapdragon 625 and SNAPDRAGON 430 processors, first select the first option in the drop-down list and click the button " New search" Then choose the second option and click "Add".

As you can see, everything is extremely simple, and the database is running instantly. All successful search and quick smartphones!

Comparison of Snapdragon 435 and 625 processors for the speed of telephones and their autonomy. What better for everyday needs, what smartphones are better for games?

Snapdragon 435 and Snapdragon 625 processors are focused on different mobile phone market segments. The first is put in smartphones, which can be safe, or with some reservations, as in the case of LG Q6, attributed to the budget segment. The second more often appears in the devices of the average price range. Compare such chipsets are simple enough, because the benchmarks are clearly allowed to understand who is the main thing here and which processor is better.

In the proposed comparison of Snapdragon 435 and 625, we will show the real balance of forces in benchmarks and explain what the existing difference is caused. We will compare the figures computing power central processor (CPU), according to the potential of the graphics adapter, as well as in economia of working with the battery. Comparing the autonomy of phones will show how much Xiaomi smartphones with almost identical batteries, but different processors work on one charge.

Snapdragon 435: Characteristics

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 processor is a slightly improved version of the previous model - Snapdragon 430. There are no cardinal differences between chipsets, Americans simply replaced the modem to a newer (CAT 13/7), leaving the same nuclei architecture and their clock frequency.

Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 is built on eight Cortex-A53 reference cores. This is a kernel with low or medium computing power (depends on clock frequency). In the specifications of mobile phones, you can often find the Snapdragon 435 Octa-Core characteristic. The term OCTA-CORE emphasizes that the processor is eight-nuclear, although if the chip model is specified, such a clarification is redundant.

From the point of view of the Architecture of the differences from S625. Snapdragon 625 - eight-nuclear processor, built on the same Cortex-A53 kernels, but when comparing clock frequencies, we see a huge difference. If in the 625th Dragon the kernel is dispersed to 2.0 GHz, then in the 435th model, the limit clock frequency is limited to 1.4 GHz. It turns out that S435 will be slower than 30% more slowly.

The difference in clock frequencies is a direct consequence. technological process production. The S625 chipset is made according to the norms of 14 nm technical process. This means that it is less suspended and, accordingly, can maintain stability when working at higher frequencies. It is appropriate to note that it is the critical heating under load forcing the limit frequency of the processor.

S435 is made according to the standards of the outdated 28 Nm of technical process. It is in a much greater degree of heating, because of which the limit clock frequency should be lower. What we see with the direct comparison of Snapdragon 625 and 435.

TEMPROSESSA affects another one the most important characteristic The processor is its energy efficiency. The thinner of the technical process, the more economical chipsets spends the battery, and the longer it works mobile phone From one charge. Snapdragon 625 uses a thinner production process, which automatically increases the autonomy of devices running on it. The proof of this will be in the second part of the article when we move on from the theory to the tests of mobile phones.

Graphic accelerators in the Snapdragon 435 and 625 of the same generation, although different versions. It would be possible to assume that the speed of work in the games will be comparable, but this is not the case, since the total computing power of the 435th dragon is significantly lower, and this affects the framework. But here it is better not to rush with the conclusions, because when choosing a cheap gaming smartphone, you have to consider an additional factor - screen resolution. Read more about this below in the text.

So, the Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 processor has modest characteristics. He is inferior to the opponent in clock frequency The works of the CPU nuclei and in the manufacturing process. Let's see how the backlog affects the speed of smartphones on Snapdragon 435 and Snapdragon 625.

Snapdragon 435 or Snapdragon 625: What is better in the benchmarks?

For comparison in the benchmarks, we chose 3-4 phone on the processors that interest us. It would be possible to take more devices, but it will not affect the overall picture, so we decided not to load charts with additional (and redundant in this case) information.

Represent Snapdragon 435 Phones

Their opponents today will be such models on Snapdragon 625:

• Moto G5s Plus.

First, compare the computational power of the central processor SNAPDRAGON 625 and 435. This parameter affects the smoothness of the work. operating system, installation speed, work and launch of applications, on the stability of applications, as well as on many other processes, including the speed of autofocus or HDR in the smartphone chamber.

For comparison, the CPU is traditionally used by Benchmark GEEKBENCH. The total speed of the phone is rated in the Antutu benchmark. Figures in front of you in diagrams, and immediately under them a short summary.

GEEKBENCH 4.1 (Multi-Core)

GEEKBENCH 4.1 (Single-Core)

Snapdragon 435 in Antutu 6

In GeekBench 4.1 in the multitasking mode, Snapdragon 625 is twice as fast as a competitor. In the single kernel mode, the gap between the processors is not so large, but it is impossible not to notice it. As for the antute, here the general picture is represented completely: in the pair of Snapdragon 435 VS 625, a processor with a large number is faster than a competitor by 29-32%, that is, as we predicted.

Speed \u200b\u200bof work in games

What devices can claim the title of an inexpensive game smartphone - on Snapdragon 435 or 625? TO this moment The question may seem rhetorical, but not so simple. We check the alignment of forces in 3D GFX 3.1 benchmark. Perhaps we will get a slightly different picture?

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

When simulating the identical resolution on smartphones (1080r), the advantage of the 625th is no doubt. However, here in the game comes additional parameter In the form of screen resolution. Most smartphones on S625 have a FullHD screen that increases the load on graphic adapter. Smartphones on Snapdragon 435 are characterized by a greater variability: there is both models with a FullHD screen and devices with a smaller resolution of 720 to 1280 points.

And here the picture is changing. When resolving HD Snapdragon 435 is ahead of a competitor. This does not mean that the processor is more powerful. Just due to the smaller load on the graphics adapter, the device can give a higher and stable framerate in games.

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (OnScreen)

It turns out that if you are looking for a budget (truly budget) game smartphone, and ready to close your eyes to a shortage of total computing power, phones on Snapdragon 435 may turn out to be the best choice, but provided that they have a HD screen (resolution of 720 x 1280). Just in case, we have prepared a list of such devices.

Snapdragon 435 Phone List with HD Screen:

• Xiaomi Redmi 4X.
• Huawei enjoy 6s.
• ZTE Nubia M2 Play
• OPPO A57

These smartphones on S435 are really inexpensive and can provide a good frame in games. The only thing you should warn - the autonomy of the device will be desired, and about it in the next part. comparative review processors.

Autonomy

If the autonomy of the smartphone is in the first place for you, unambiguously select the device on S625. Proof of this is a comparison of the work time from one charge of two phones xiaomi. - REDMI 4X and REDMI 5 Plus. With the same battery capacity of the REDMI 5 Plus, the S625 holds the battery longer, and this is despite the screen of 6 inches with a fullHD + resolution. Even with an active screen, it consumes the battery charge slower, which perfectly illustrates the superiority of the 625th Dragon in this matter.

The autonomy of smartphones on Snapdragon 435 and 625.

	REDMI 4X (S435)	REDMI 5 Plus (S625)
Battery	4100 mAh.	4000 mAh.
Autonomy rating	80 hours	104 hours
Calls 3G.	19:38	22:16
the Internet	11:37	13:36
Video	12:00	14:13

Results of comparison Snapdragon 435 and 625

So, in the pair of processors Snapdragon 435 VS 625 what is better? Definitely better than Snapdragon 625. It is faster, smartphones on this processor keep the battery charge better. But if you want to play a new phone in games, consider that S625 put on phones with a screen resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, while Snapdragon 435 can be found in cheaper models with HD display. A smaller resolution will provide a larger framegrain in games, although the detail in this situation will have to donate. On the other hand, you can take a model on S625 and reduce resolution to HD in the settings.

The choice is always yours, we hope that the material turned out to be useful and informative. Thanks for your attention, always glad to see you on the pages of Five-Inches!