Contacts

Smartphones with the best camera: Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium or Huawei P20 Pro. Who will receive the third place? LG, Sony or Huawei? What is better than Huaway or Sony Iquisper

I think many are interested to know whose camera is better - Huawei flagship or flagship Sony. Speech, of course, about Huawei Mate. 9, possessing the top chamber among smartphones of the Chinese company, the same as the new and P10 Plus, as well as Sony Xperia. Xz.

It is clear that the Xperia XZ Premium will be released in June, which has an absolutely new camera with a new level of shooting quality, but until then the original Xperia XZ is still a top phone Sony.

Let's look at the external on two rivals:



Specifications of the main chambers of Huawei Mate 9 and Sony Xperia XZ:

  • Xperia xz. Exmor RS, 23 MP, Light F2.0, 24 mm Focus Distance, 5-axis Stabilization Steadyshot, Laser Autofocus, Infrared Sensor, RGBC-IR Sensor.
  • Mate 9. Double, 12 meters (color) + 20 meters (monochrome), lighting F2.2, 27 mm focal length, laser autofocus + phase autofocus + deep autofocus (depth autofocus), optical stabilization, double-tont flash, 2x zoom "without quality loss "

Xperia XZ and Mate 9 cameras differ significantly. Although they are united by "troubleshooting" used by branded technologies.

However, Huawei Mate 9 causes more admiration for at least "on paper". Let's see how it will actually.

Additional materials:

Camera Comparison: Huawei Mate 9 VS Sony Xperia XZ

Before viewing the comparison of the cameras, read the terms and range of photography:

  • Both smartphones were removed in auto mode, without further processing.
  • The original resolution of the photo in Xperia XZ is 23 meters with the aspect ratio of 4: 3, and Huawei Mate 9 12 MP 4: 3
  • The shooting was made from the hands in the same position without taking off the place. Due to different things focus distance Camera lenses (XZ - 24 mm, and Mate 9 - 27 mm) It seems that with Mate 9 removed from a closer distance
  • Focus point in each frame strictly in the center

In the future, all pictures were perched 1: 1 for more convenient viewing.

XPERIA XZ VS Huawei Mate 9. Photographing, day series














All frames were made in cloudy weather, which is the most difficult scenario for cameras. mobile devices With their small matrices.

Shooting closeup, sharpness frame and white balance selection Obviously on the side huawei cameras Mate 9. The flagship of the Chinese company wins, and significantly. I also note the wider dynamic range of Mate 9.

In the advantages of XPERIA XZ you can safely burn better detail (on source pictures is good) due to higher resolution, as well as realistic color reproduction.

Both smartphones coped well, but I liked the pictures with Huawei Mate 9.

Xperia XZ VS Huawei Mate 9. Photographing, Night Series







In the night shooting Huawei Mate 9 won on all fronts. Optical stabilization, high-quality optics and softened software did not leave Xperia XZ chances.

Download photo in source capacity:

Sources - Yandex.Disk

Comparison of the quality of zoom when photography

Two separate pictures for checking and comparing zooms. Huawei Mate 9 is a two-time zoom "without loss", which, according to the manufacturer, is no different from the real optical, and Sony Xperia XZ is 5x Clear Zoom, which is set at 2x position. We look at what happened.

Without zoom:


With zoom:


Huawei did not lie. 2x zoom in Mate 9 really fit tool for shooting, loss as minimal.

XPERIA XZ VS Huawei Mate 9. Video shooting

***

Huawei Mate 9 and Sony Xperia XZ provide a worthy level of quality in the photo and video. It is enough for most users, as they say "with head".

But it would be a flawback not to note the more advanced possibilities of Mate 9, because it is not only best quality Shooting.


The Huawei Mate 9 camera is essentially a creative tool for mobile photographers, only here is a real black and white mode due to monochrome 20 MP sensor. Believe me, h / b pictures on Mate 9 are obtained much cooler than when using the filter in Instagram. The difference is huge.

In addition, full manual mode Mate 9 helps to embody almost any ideas that are not available, for example, for Xperia XZ. First of all, this is a shot at long exposure.

We are waiting for Xperia XZ Premium and hope that this time Sony will show new level Mobile photo quality. 😉

And another amoled matrix in Samsung is calibrated under the cinema color palette DCI-P3 (more shades than in the standard SRGB and very useful for video in HDR format, which will come to the change of familiar formats and "take off" in the near future). Huawei, theoretically, is also friendly with a similar implementation of the HDR10 (because more Mate 10 Pro got a display with support for such color reproduction), but only theoretically: official references to the "back for the future for watching a movie" in P20 Pro Huvaveevtsi did not.

The display in Sony is a completely different school. While all competitors put in the flagship Mobile Mobiles Oled / Amoled Matrix, the Japanese are still true IPS, the type of displays, which until recently was in all smartphones, except samsung.

Is this good or bad? None nor the other - each type of matrix has its advantages. For example, Sony will be a nice to those who notices the flicker of amoled displays (in them each pixel glows separately, and the backlight has a common screen). Yes, and on the detail of the picture Sony, Huawei is ahead: in AMOLED / OLED pixels are not full, but "diluted" (Pentile technology), therefore, even with the same diagonal, the Xperia screen would still display a picture of a little more than P20 Pro. In defense of OLED panels, it can be said that they are less intensively consumed the battery charge and it is easier to read information under the sun's rays in summer. No in the world of perfection ...

But even more sorry that there are no perfections in the Japanese flagship mobile mobile phones: what display modes in Xperia XZ2 are neither choosing, shades will still be wounded towards the blue. This feeling seems to be looking at the picture on the screen through a slightly tinted sunglasses. You can live with this, but when you remove the glasses (you look at the Samsung, Huawei screen or a good monitor or TV), you understand that something with a picture on the screen of your smartphone is not that. I hope the Japanese also understand this flames and fix the color reproduction of the screen in new firmware.

By the way, the IPS matrix in Xperia XZ2 is also configured under the HDR10 formats (and otherwise, because the HDR video removes the smartphone camera, and this video needs to be properly displayed), and the films in such formats look above all praise in such formats.

In short: Screen samsung Ideal in color, but trimmed over the level of brightness, in Huawei with color rendition, everything is also cool, but below the clarity of the picture, and in the display Sony "splashing blue" where you need, and where you do not need

Sound (headphones)

The sound quality in headphones is one of the disciplines for which Sony Xperia XZ2 want to forgive all the flaws. The coolest sounding mobile phone in our Trinity of the flagships! The clarity of bulk, but even the "plates" do not cut the rumor, the volume is unobtrusive, without echo, the effects of the Aquarium and other duty. And from the voice, tools and special effects nothing "hits the ears" and does not act on the nerves, even if listening to music long hours contract. The volume is enough even on high-resistant (read: huge) monitor headphones of the "Drinking pilot" format, while the sound quality is equally high, in which direction you would neither turn the slider. Everything is so any, expensive and pleasant that even the desire does not occur such a sound to somehow change.

But if I still want to "season" the sound of the cinema volume (Surround settings), to force the Bass "Pumping" headphones (Clear Bass) or improve the audio recording (DSEE HX), which the time and the fight against copyright holders interrupted in VKontakte.

But in Samsung, all this is not possible, but need to To do, because the sound in the Korean flagship "from the factory" will unpleasantly surprise you - the smartphone for a thousand bucks plays almost the same as Galaxy J5 (2017), which is four times cheaper.

The volume of the volume is, of course, the most huge (it is deserted earlier than reach the volume to the limit level), but the sound of sound is not flagship, and the sound itself is so flat, as if your headphones are made of plastic velockers, which are scattered in children's sandboxes. Or as if you had a little bit, you had a rumor.

Now we are in such a situation when the mobile market is being struggle not only for the first place, and for the third, where the battle between competitors is much more interesting than between Samsung and Apple. It is already obvious that the leaders do not sink and hard to believe that someone will be able to get closer next year or even further in the future. However, if someone from catching up will be able to fix it very much in third place, it may appear a chance to change the leaders. And three catching up are LG, Huawei and Sony.

LG: 45 million

These three companies have ambitious plans for the remainder of the year. LG invests all his hopes in G2, which debuts on August 7 in New York. The Korean company has already started advertising a new device, and I expect a further high push in promotion to cause interest in G2.

LG wants to sell 10 million units of the G2 smartphone, which may seem not so much compared to blockbusters as Samsung Galaxy S4, but it is very ambitious for a relatively small player in the market, like LG. Having in the near future, G2, and quite successful Optimus G and G Pro, which brought the company in third place in the first quarter of 2013, LG will increase to 45 million sales of smartphones this year, which is 5 million more, which was originally planned. And at the beginning of 2017, LG K10 was also published, which has excellent characteristics.

Huawei: 60 million

Huawei is as an ambitious Chinese giant and large player In the domestic market, and therefore it is not surprising that in 2013, Huawei wants to sell at least 60 million smartphones. This is a high plank, but if Huawei will play with its cards correctly, then he can make a profit from LTE "Boom", which, as expected, captures China soon.

In the international market, Huawei will continue to produce attractive devices, such as Ascend P6 - the most thin smartphone in the world. Are Huawei's objectives realistic and achievable? Last year, the company had the same goal of 60 million sold devices, which was inaccessible. Maybe this year everything will be different?

Sony: 42 million

Sony may be a dark horse in the smartphone race of this year. After a long period of the backlog of competitors as according to characteristics, design and softwareIn 2012, Sony has already become increased strength to return lost positions. The Chinese press exploded with articles on the launch of Xperia Z Ultra, and that the company plans to sell 42 million smartphones in 2013, that is, until the end of the year, to be in third place. Xperia Z and the whole line this year was moderately successful, while Z Ultra can be a good competitor to the Samsung Galaxy Note line.

But, probably, the real hope of Sony is to I1, also known as Honami, who, according to rumors, is the first device created from scratch on the One Sony project. One Sony is a company plan where Sony will use only their strength and all its own technological base for the release of products. In other words, I1 can bring a great profit of Sony if the company will use all many years of experience.

Conclusion

So, what will happen in third place until December 31? Judging by the expectations that the company presented, success can reach Huawei, but the story tells us that the goals and achievements may not coincide that it is especially strongly related to smart business.

At best, for Android ecosystem, if all three players can achieve their goals, which will have the strongest pressure on Samsung and Apple. After all, today both giants show a slowdown in sales, and this gives an excellent chance to return to some of the status quo. In any case, from this war manufacturers, we, as consumers, will only win.

And another amoled matrix in Samsung is calibrated under the cinema color palette DCI-P3 (more shades than in the standard SRGB and very useful for video in HDR format, which will come to the change of familiar formats and "take off" in the near future). Huawei, theoretically, is also friendly with a similar implementation of the HDR10 (because more Mate 10 Pro got a display with support for such color reproduction), but only theoretically: official references to the "back for the future for watching a movie" in P20 Pro Huvaveevtsi did not.

The display in Sony is a completely different school. While all competitors put in the flagship Mobile Mobiles Oled / Amoled Matrix, the Japanese are still true IPS, the type of displays, which until recently was in all smartphones, except samsung.

Is this good or bad? None nor the other - each type of matrix has its advantages. For example, Sony will be a nice to those who notices the flicker of amoled displays (in them each pixel glows separately, and the backlight has a common screen). Yes, and on the detail of the picture Sony, Huawei is ahead: in AMOLED / OLED pixels are not full, but "diluted" (Pentile technology), therefore, even with the same diagonal, the Xperia screen would still display a picture of a little more than P20 Pro. In defense of OLED panels, it can be said that they are less intensively consumed the battery charge and it is easier to read information under the sun's rays in summer. No in the world of perfection ...

But even more sorry that there are no perfections in the Japanese flagship mobile mobile phones: what display modes in Xperia XZ2 are neither choosing, shades will still be wounded towards the blue. This feeling seems to be looking at the picture on the screen through a slightly tinted sunglasses. You can live with this, but when you remove the glasses (you look at the Samsung, Huawei screen or a good monitor or TV), you understand that something with a picture on the screen of your smartphone is not that. I hope the Japanese also understand this flames and fix the color reproduction of the screen in new firmware.

By the way, the IPS matrix in Xperia XZ2 is also configured under the HDR10 formats (and otherwise, because the HDR video removes the smartphone camera, and this video needs to be properly displayed), and the films in such formats look above all praise in such formats.

In short: the Samsung screen is ideal in color, but it is cut in the level of brightness, in Huawei with the color rendition everything is also cool, but below the clarity of the picture, and in the Sony display "splashing blue" where you need, and where you do not need

Sound (headphones)

The sound quality in headphones is one of the disciplines for which Sony Xperia XZ2 want to forgive all the flaws. The coolest sounding mobile phone in our Trinity of the flagships! The clarity of bulk, but even the "plates" do not cut the rumor, the volume is unobtrusive, without echo, the effects of the Aquarium and other duty. And from the voice, tools and special effects, nothing "beats on the ears" and does not act on the nerves, even if listening to music for long hours in a row. The volume is enough even on high-resistant (read: huge) monitor headphones of the "Drinking pilot" format, while the sound quality is equally high, in which direction you would neither turn the slider. Everything is so any, expensive and pleasant that even the desire does not occur such a sound to somehow change.

But if I still want to "season" the sound of the cinema volume (Surround settings), to force the Bass "Pumping" headphones (Clear Bass) or improve the audio recording (DSEE HX), which the time and the fight against copyright holders interrupted in VKontakte.

But in Samsung, all this is not possible, but need to To do, because the sound in the Korean flagship "from the factory" will unpleasantly surprise you - the smartphone for a thousand bucks plays almost the same as Galaxy J5 (2017), which is four times cheaper.

The volume of the volume is, of course, the most huge (it is deserted earlier than reach the volume to the limit level), but the sound of sound is not flagship, and the sound itself is so flat, as if your headphones are made of plastic velockers, which are scattered in children's sandboxes. Or as if you had a little bit, you had a rumor.

Which phone is better? Everything inside. Sony Experia M or Huawei Ascend. P1 and got the best answer

Answer from Mashka [Guru]
Here these statements like "Huaveway is not reliable, since it is a Chinese" I'm just killed! Is NTS not a Chinese? ? And Acer, Meizu, USUS is not Chinese? ? Eyser Smartphones are generally not killed! Do you think why not even very powerful by the characteristics of Acer smartphones such expensive? Yes because scarring on summit. NTS is bought in our country as hot cakes and something shine screams face with the thoughts "This is the same Chinese" ... Huawei Mate 6.1 "I used - a great device. The assembly is super! The interface is cool, the screen is awesome, everything works and everything works and works At the same time without brakes. Of course, Mait is not a couple of Askunda P1, after all, it is a lot of less productive and the screen in P1 is shy.
At the expense of the smartphones, that indicated in this question. Xperia M I would not take myself to take 3 reasons: 1) a very low screen resolution, 2) a very small amount of built-in memory (you will be available to a little more than 1.5 GB - it's very little for Full use of the smartphone), 3) enough mediocre camera.
Huaweia Ascend P1 in all better Sony except memory. Askunda P1 is also only 4GB of which you will only be available 1.5. This is not enough!
I advise you to take a cool novelty for the same money. ASUS Zenfone 5 16GB. For money, it costs from 7,000 to 8500 rubles. , i.e. it is somewhere 7500 on average. (Approximately the same amount is asdend p1) but taking asus you get better smartphone For the same money! ! Painting processor, Better I. more screenThat will be more convenient on the Internet, when reading, when watching videos and photos, well, and the fact that instead of 1.5 GB you will have 11 GB tolerates unequivocally towards Asus. For the device for the money he is just a super-duper! 5-inch screen with HD resolution, 2GB RAM, 16GB internal memory, 2x nuclear processor with a frequency of 1.6 GHz. , Camera 8MR. , two sims and battery 2100mach. With all this, it is thin and beautiful. For these 7-7.5 thousand rubles super!
link
Even from the same brand there is a cool smartphone (he is a little cheaper, but according to the characteristics, it is definitely better than the same Xperia M) -tho ASUS Padfone Mini 4.3. Smartphone without docks can be bought in 5500-6500.
A source:

Answer from Іteri.[guru]
Me Huaway is more like more.


Answer from Yum, but artificial![guru]
Both are not very.
Sony Xperia M is just a disgusting camera (removes worse than those that without autofocus, blurred) - you can see examples of photo: (Such links are on Yandex Market in the characteristics of the device, and if not - look for the name of the model on Yandex pictures, there Looking for both EXIF, and on the description of the photo)
And Huawei is generally good (in particular, the camera is higher praise), but not very reliable, since "Chinese". Moreover, he ... Huway ... Sounds the name? I will not take yourself only because of this, like the alkatell idol and ... Here (the new name of devices from the company Nokia).
Take Nokia, what will like it.


Answer from Karolina-katrin.[guru]
Huawei Ascend P1.



Did you like the article? Share it